Federal National Mortgage Association v. Sokha Pech et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 10, 2013
JUDGMENT CANCELLING INSTRUMENT AND QUIETING TITLE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. The Court hereby declares and adjudges that Plaintiff is the true and lawful owner of the real property commonly known as 4518 Ranger Avenue, El Monte, California 91731 (th e "Subject Property:) to the exclusion of any purported interest claimed by Defendants. The Court finds that the recordation and filing of the Grant Deed described in paragraph 2 above was done with malice and with intent to injure Plaintiff by creating a cloud upon Plaintiff's ownership interest in and to the Subject Property as there was no legal or factual basis under which Defendants could have lawfully recorded or filed said document. Plaintiff shall have and recover from Defenda nts, it's reasonable attorney fees incurred in removing the cloud upon title caused by Defendants' action in recording the invalid document described in paragraph 2 above in the sum of $5,508.72. (See document for further details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|May 14, 2013
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiff is ordered to file a brief, not to exceed ten pages, by no later than Friday, May 24, 2013 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to satisfy the amount in controversy requirement. The parties should also deliver a courtesy copy to chambers. (lc) .Modified on 5/14/2013 .(lc).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?