Dante Modaffari v. McGrew
Petitioner: Dante Modaffari
Respondent: Warden McGrew
Case Number: 2:2013cv02080
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Victor B. Kenton
Presiding Judge: Beverly Reid O'Connell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell.Pursuant to the "Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 31 ," IT IS ADJUDGED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 12 is denied, (2) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, and (3) this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (afe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dante Modaffari v. McGrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden McGrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dante Modaffari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?