United Fabrics International Inc v. Body Central et al
| United Fabrics International Inc |
| Love Culture Inc, Event Inc, Does, Boston Proper Inc, Body Central, Bodell Inc and Zinga Inc |
| 2:2013cv02813 |
| April 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order 46 . See document for details. (yb)
|
|
Filing
19
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS)Re Order to Show Cause for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, he reby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writingno later than July 5, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant's Answer to Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendant. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
