Juan Fuentes Alonso v. K Chappell

Juan Fuentes Alonso v. K Chappell

Petitioner:	Juan Fuentes Alonso
Respondent:	K Chappell
Case Number:	2:2013cv03093
Filed:	May 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:	Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 18, 2013	Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS SUCCESSIVE AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice as successive and for failure to prosecute and follow Court orders. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. See attached Order. (es)
May 8, 2013	Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF SUCCESSIVE PETITION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to show cause why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Specifically, petitioner must submit to the Court no later than May 29, 2013, documentation showing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit issued such an order. Failure to respond by May 29, 2013, will result in the instant Petition being summarily dismissed without prejudice.1 See Reyes v. Vaughn, 276 F.Supp.2d 1027, 1029-30 (C.D. Cal. 2003) (dismissing successive petition without prejudice to petitioner's right to seek authorization from the Ninth Circuit). (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 18, 2013

Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS SUCCESSIVE AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice as successive and for failure to prosecute and follow Court orders. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. **See attached Order.** (es)

May 8, 2013

Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF SUCCESSIVE PETITION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to show cause why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Specifically, petitioner must submit to the Court no later than May 29, 2013, documentation showing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit issued such an order. Failure to respond by May 29, 2013, will result in the instant Petition being summarily dismissed without prejudice.1 See Reyes v. Vaughn, 276 F.Supp.2d 1027, 1029-30 (C.D. Cal. 2003) (dismissing successive petition without prejudice to petitioner's right to seek authorization from the Ninth Circuit). (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juan Fuentes Alonso v. K Chappell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Fuentes Alonso
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: K Chappell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?