Charles Lee Dotson v. People of the State of California
Petitioner: Charles Lee Dotson
Respondent: People of the State of California
Case Number: 2:2013cv03211
Filed: May 6, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 27 . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles Lee Dotson v. People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of California
Represented By: David Elgin Madeo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Lee Dotson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?