Jeremy Coltharp et al v. Herrera et al
| Edith Frazier and Jeremy Coltharp |
| Does and Larry Herrera |
| 2:2013cv03263 |
| May 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Audrey B. Collins |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT, LARRY HERRERA'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORALTERNATIVELY FOR PARTIALSUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr, in favor of Larry Herrera against Edith Frazier: Defendant's Motion f or Summary Judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 56, came on regularly for hearing on December 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 790 of the above-entitled court. After considering the papers filed in support of the motion, including the Se parate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Supporting Evidence, the opposition and Statement of Disputed Material Facts, and the reply thereto, and the oral argument of counsel, the court finds that there exists no triable issue of material fact requiring the weighing process of the jury, and that the Defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The Court ordered that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court now orders that judgment be issued in Defendant's favor, with costs and attorney's fees to be awarded pursuant to a timely filed memorandum of costs and motion for attorney's fees. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
