Bioriginal Food and Science Corporation v. Biotab Nutraceuticals Inc et al
Plaintiff: Bioriginal Food and Science Corporation
Defendant: Gregory Andruk, Biotab Nutraceuticals Inc, Global Product Management Inc and Adam Zwicker
Case Number: 2:2013cv05704
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 355 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 354 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ec)
August 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 284 MINUTES OF DEFENDANTS SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIALSUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 146 , filed July 6, 2015) held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: In accordance with the foregoing, defendants motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED in its entirety. (SEE ATTACHED) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (kss)
June 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 124 MINUTES OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS (Dkt. No. 83); MOTION FOR EXPEDITEDDISCOVERY (Dkt. No. 84); MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER (Dkt. No. 85) (filed May 18, 2015) held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: In accor dance with the foregoing, the Court DENIES defendants motions to modify the scheduling order, file amended counterclaims, and expedite discovery. The denial of the discovery motion is without prejudice to its being renewed before Magistrate Judge Ei ck. The trial in this matter will be held on September 22, 2015 at 9:30 A.M.; the pretrial conference/motions in limine hearing will be held on August 24, 2015 at 11:00 A.M., and discovery will close on August 17, 2015. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (pj)
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 103 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DEFENDANTS EX PARTE APPLICATION TOSHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON VARIOUS MOTIONS (Dkt. No. 87, filed May 18, 2015) 87 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court is in receipt of defendants ex parte application to shorten time for the hearing of their motions to continue the trial and related dates, file amended counterclaims, and conduct certain expedited discovery, which motions are currently set for hearing on June 15, 2015. Having considered defendants arguments, the application is DENIED. If the Court concludes at the regularly noticed hearing that a continuance of trial and other dates is appropriate, the Court will set new scheduling dates. (pj)
May 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for leave to file First Amended Affirmative Defenses 62 . Defendants are to file their proposed amended affirmative defenses forthwith, with the exception that they are not to include a statute of limitations defense in that amended pleading. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
November 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re Stipulation for Protective Order 43 . See Order for details. (dml)
December 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendants' Consolidated Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for More Definite Statement, or to Strike Portions of the Complaint 13 . The Court hereby GRANTS defendants' motion t o dismiss plaintiff's fifth through eleventh claims, and DENIES defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's first through fourth claims. Defendants' motion to strike references to attorneys' fees is hereby GRANTED; defendants&# 039; motion to strike references to punitive damages is DENIED as moot. Defendants' motion for a more definite statement is hereby DENIED. Plaintiff shall have until 1/13/2013 to file an amended complaint that corrects the deficiencies identified herein. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bioriginal Food and Science Corporation v. Biotab Nutraceuticals Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Andruk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Biotab Nutraceuticals Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Global Product Management Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Zwicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bioriginal Food and Science Corporation
Represented By: Jeffrey L Fillerup
Represented By: Jennifer Connors Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?