Erik Rothenberg v. Catherine Marie Frazier et al
||Does and Catherine Marie Frazier
||August 7, 2013
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||John E. McDermott
||Otis D. Wright
|Nature of Suit:
||Torts to Land
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 11, 2013
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court concludes that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction in this case and must dismiss the case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). For the reasons discussed in the Order, the Court hereby DISMISS ES WITH PREJUDICE Rothenbergs FDCPA claim. The Court declines supplemental jurisdiction on the remaining state-law claims because there is no independent basis for subject-matter jurisdiction over these claims. Accordingly, the Court also DISMISSES Rothenberg's claim under the Declaratory Judgment Act. This Clerk of Court is ordered to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (cch)
|August 16, 2013
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 7 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Rothenberg is directed to manually file his First Amended Complaint under Local Rule 3-2. Rothenberg shall file within 5 days, by way of a declaration, a document showing the changes made between the original Complaint and the First Amended Complaint. (lom)
|August 12, 2013
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Rothenberg is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss his FDCPA cause of action as a matter of law. Rothenbe rg is advised that if the FDCPA cause of action is dismissed, this Court must dismiss this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Rothenberg must file a response to this order to show cause by August 19,2013. No hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to timely file a response willresult in dismissal of this case. (mg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?