Erik Rothenberg v. Catherine Marie Frazier et al
Plaintiff: Erik Rothenberg
Defendant: Does and Catherine Marie Frazier
Case Number: 2:2013cv05729
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court concludes that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction in this case and must dismiss the case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). For the reasons discussed in the Order, the Court hereby DISMISS ES WITH PREJUDICE Rothenbergs FDCPA claim. The Court declines supplemental jurisdiction on the remaining state-law claims because there is no independent basis for subject-matter jurisdiction over these claims. Accordingly, the Court also DISMISSES Rothenberg's claim under the Declaratory Judgment Act. This Clerk of Court is ordered to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (cch)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 7 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Rothenberg is directed to manually file his First Amended Complaint under Local Rule 3-2. Rothenberg shall file within 5 days, by way of a declaration, a document showing the changes made between the original Complaint and the First Amended Complaint. (lom)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Rothenberg is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss his FDCPA cause of action as a matter of law. Rothenbe rg is advised that if the FDCPA cause of action is dismissed, this Court must dismiss this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Rothenberg must file a response to this order to show cause by August 19,2013. No hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to timely file a response willresult in dismissal of this case. (mg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erik Rothenberg v. Catherine Marie Frazier et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Catherine Marie Frazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erik Rothenberg
Represented By: Robert E Drescher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?