Yolanda Trotter et al v. The County of Los Angeles et al
| David Ezell Trotter, Yolie Perez, Oretha Trotter, Patricia A. Trotter and Yolanda Trotter |
| The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, The County of Los Angeles, Unknown Mekdara, Unknown Kneer, Joana Gomez, D. Fitzpatrick, Does, Bobby D. Denham, Glenn Brandon, Head Sheriff Leroy D. Baca and Unknown Tucker |
| 2:2013cv06293 |
| August 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
(IN CHAMBER) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams.Accordingly, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, no later than January 21, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and follow court orders. The filing of a Second Amended Complaint on or before January 21, 2015, shall be deemed compliance with this order to show cause. Plaintiffs are advised that the failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. *See attached Order for details.* (es)
|
|
Filing
70
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. On October 21, 2014, the Court granted plaintiffs Trotter and Perezs Motion for Extension of Time, and set the deadline for plaintiffs to filed a Second Amended Complaint, as required by the Courts Order Dismissing First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend, as no later than December 5, 2014. That deadline has now passed, and plaintiffs have not filed a Second Amended Complaint. Accordingly, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, no la ter than December 17, 2014, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and follow court orders. The filing of a Second Amended Complaint on or before December 17, 2014, shall be deemed compliance with this order to show cause. (es)
|
|
Filing
9
MINUTES (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. On October 3, 2013, Yolanda Trotter ("Trotter") filed a Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees in this action. On October 11, 2013, the Court granted her Request based on the financial information contained therein. On October 18, 2013, Trotter signed a second Request, and submitted it to the Court. Trotter's responses to certain financial questions in the second Request are entirely different from the same q uestions in the first Request. Trotter signed both Requests under penalty of perjury. Accordingly, NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 29, 2013, Trotter is ordered to show cause why the Court's authorization to file this action without prepayment of the filing fees should not be withdrawn, and this action dismissed, based on her inconsistent, yet sworn, responses. Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to follow court orders. (ch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
