MCL Fresh Inc v. SH Enterprises Inc et al
||MCL Fresh Inc
||SH Enterprises Inc, Tae Ho Min, Hui Min and Does
||October 30, 2013
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Charles F. Eick
||Philip S. Gutierrez
|Nature of Suit:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 14, 2014
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Does, SH Enterprises Inc, Hui Min, Tae Ho Min against MCL Fresh Inc.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. Judgment is hereby entered on the Complaint in favor of plaintiff MC L Fresh, Inc., and against defendants SH Enterprises, Inc. dba California Mart, Hui Min, and Tae Ho Min, jointly and severally, in the amount of $ 159,837.08. 2. Plaintiff MCL Fresh, Inc. is awarded its attorneys' fees in the amount of $6,796.74. 3. PlaintiffMCL Fresh is awarded its costs pursuant to Local Rule 54-3. THE CLERK IS ORDERED TO ENTER THE JUDGMENT. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|January 22, 2014
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before February 5, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecutio n. The Court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the entire action. RE: Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff OR Request to Clerk for Entry ofDefault Judgment by Plaintiff......( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/5/2014.) (lw)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?