City Drinker, Inc. v. Lakshmi Kodali et al
| City Drinker, Inc. |
| Does, Lakshmi Kodali, Cheeti Pavan Kumar Rao, Lad It Solutions Ltd., Lad Software Solutions Ltd., Kodali Nagarjuna Rao, Kodali Uma and Preethi Yalamanchili |
| City Drinker, Inc., Daniel Fugardi, Benson Juarez and Francis Martin Konig |
| Daniel Fugardi, Benson Juarez and Francis Martin Konig |
| Lakshmi Kodali, Cheeti Pavan Kumar Rao and Lad Software Solutions Ltd. |
| 2:2013cv09223 |
| December 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Percy Anderson |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. The first claim for relief alleged in City Drinker's First Amended Complaint for securities fraud is dismissed with prejudice; and 2. The remainder of this action is dismissed without prejudice; and 3. Each party shall bear their own costs of suit. Related to: APPLICATION for Default Judgment against defendant Cheeti Pavan Kumar Rao 120 ; Order on Application 125 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
|
|
Filing
91
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court orders lead trial counsel to meet and confer in person concerning the pretrial documents. This meet and confer must occur no later than January 14, 2015. The parties shall file revised pretr ial documents by 12:00 p.m. on January 15, 2015. Lead trial counsel shall file declarations concerning their meet and confer efforts no later than 12:00 p.m. on January 15, 2015. The declarations shall discuss what efforts they have made to narrow th e issues for trial and to prepare pretrial documents that comply with the Local Rules and this Court's orders. Once the Court has reviewed the revised pretrial documents and counsel's declarations, the Court will notify the parties if they have made sufficient progress to proceed with the pretrial conference, currently on calendar for January 16, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. Because the parties were previously warned that future violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules , or the orders of the Court may result in the imposition of sanctions, and the parties have nevertheless appeared to violate the Local Rules and the Court's orders, the parties and their counsel are ordered to show cause in writing why they should not be sanctioned. The parties' responses to this order to show cause shall be filed no later than 12:00 p.m. on January 15, 2015. See document for details. (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
