Otter Products LLC et al v. Ace Colors Fashion, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Otter Products LLC and Treefrog Developments, Inc.
Defendant: Electronicos, Does, Ace Colors Fashion, Inc, Shayna's Cell Phone Accessories and Vanessa Accessories
Case Number: 2:2014cv00141
Filed: January 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Wilner
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ELECTRONICOS 60 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 8/22/2014 (lc).
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing by Wednesday, July 23, 2014, why it has not moved for entry of default against Electronicos. No hearing will be held; Plaintiff shall respond in writing. The Court will discharge this Order upon a timely application for entry of default filed with the Clerk of Court. Failure to timely respond will result in dismissal of Plaintiffs claims against Electronicos for lack of prosecution. (lc)
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ELECTRONICOS 45 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 6/18/2014. (lc).
June 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: ADEQUACY OF SERVICE TO DEFENDANT ELECTRONICOS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by Monday, June 16, 2014, why the Plaintiffs Application for Default Judgment should not be denied for lack of adequate notice. No hearing will be held; Plaintiffs shall respond in writing. Failure to timely respond will result in denial of the default judgment application. (lc). Modified on 6/9/2014. (lc).
April 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ACE COLORS FASHION, INC. 30 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc) .Modified on 4/16/2014 (lc). Modified on 4/16/2014 (lc).
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 FINAL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. DEFENDANT VANESSA ACCESSORIESS ABILITY TO PROCEED PRO SE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court once again ORDERS Vanessa Accessories through its representative to file a declaration establishing what type of legal entity it is by Friday, April 18, 2014. No hearing will be held. This is Vanessa Accessoriess final warning that failure to timely respond to this Order will result in the Court striking Vanessa Accessoriess Answer for want of licensed counsel. The Court informs Vanessa Accessories that there is a Federal Pro Se Clinic located in the United States Courthouse. (lc)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. DEFENDANT VANESSA ACCESSORIESS ABILITY TO PROCEED PRO SE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court ORDERS Vanessa Accessories through its representative to file a declaration establishing what type of legal entity it is by Wednesday, March 19, 2014. No hearing will be held. Failure to timely respond to this Order will result in the Court striking Vanessa Accessoriess Answer for want of licensed counsel. (lc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otter Products LLC et al v. Ace Colors Fashion, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Otter Products LLC
Represented By: Michael Marchand
Represented By: Brent H Blakely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Treefrog Developments, Inc.
Represented By: Brent H Blakely
Represented By: Michael Marchand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Electronicos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ace Colors Fashion, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shayna's Cell Phone Accessories
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanessa Accessories
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?