Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. C. T. and F., Inc. et al
| Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the National IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan and Trustees of the Southern California Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund |
| C. T. and F., Inc. and Ruby Jeanette Galland |
| 2:2014cv00232 |
| January 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H. King |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, in favor of Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, National Electrical Industry Fund, et al., against C. T. and F., Inc., Ruby Jeanette Galland jointly and severally, the principal amount of $ 625,000.00, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 4% per annum accruing from August 19, 2014, until the judgment is paid in full.. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 24 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
