J.M.M. Lee Properties LLC v. Airtouch Communications Inc
Plaintiff: J.M.M. Lee Properties, LLC
Defendant: Airtouch, Inc. and Airtouch Communications, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv01154
Filed: February 13, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Presiding Judge: Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of Plaintiff against Airtouch Communications, Inc., Airtouch, Inc. (ah)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of J.M.M. Lee Properties, LLC against Airtouch Communications, Inc., Airtouch, Inc.: On July 31, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the motion of plaintiff J.M.M. Lee Pro perties, LLC's ("JMM") for entry of default judgment against defendants AirTouch Communications, Inc. and AirTouch, Inc. Consequently, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That plaintiffs recover $80,000 in damages for defendants' breach of the license agreement; 2. That plaintiffs recover post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) at the rate of 0.11%; 3. That defendants, within a reasonable time, but no later than 30 days from the date of this jud gment, deliver to JMM all labels, signs, packages, wrappers, cartons, circulars, advertisements, and other items in their possession bearing or containing any reproduction or representation of the AIRTOUCH mark; 4. That defendants and their sharehol ders, directors, employees, agents, officers, subsidiaries, and parent companies that have actual notice of this order, are permanently enjoined from (a) using the AIRTOUCH mark in any manner; (b) marketing, selling, or transferring any products under or branded with the AIRTOUCH mark; and (c) marketing, selling, or transferring any shares of stock in either defendant company using the AIRTOUCH mark; and 5. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/13/2014. (ah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: J.M.M. Lee Properties LLC v. Airtouch Communications Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J.M.M. Lee Properties, LLC
Represented By: Mark J Lee
Represented By: John M Koutsoukos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Airtouch, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Airtouch Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?