Thomas Jerecki v. L. J. Milusnic
Petitioner: Thomas Jerecki
Respondent: L. J. Milusnic
Case Number: 2:2014cv01642
Filed: March 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge, It is Adjudged that the Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas Jerecki v. L. J. Milusnic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: L. J. Milusnic
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Jerecki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?