City of Almaty v. Viktor Khrapunov et al
| City of Almaty |
| 628 Holdings LLC, Madina Ablyazova, Candian International Ltd, Does, Haute Hue LLC, Elvira Khrapunov, Iliyas Khrapunov, Leila Khrapunov, Viktor Khrapunov, Dmitri Kudryashov, Elvira Kudryashova, Maro Design LLC, Mr. Fumigation Inc, RPM USA LLC and RPM-Maro LLC |
| 2:2014cv03650 |
| May 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
273
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice as to the RICO claims, and dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining state-law claims. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
|
|
Filing
177
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/22/2017. (vdr)
|
|
Filing
124
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (MD JS-6; Case Terminated) (vdr)
|
|
Filing
103
PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding Production of Documents and Information by Third Parties by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT. In re: Order 102 , Stipulation for Protective Order 100 . (mkr)
|
|
Filing
49
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/23/2014. (vdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
