Intelligent SCM, LLC v. Qannu PTY LTD et al
Intelligent SCM, LLC |
Does, Qannu PTY LTD, Andrew Leighton Speed and Bridget Victoria Speed |
2:2014cv06417 |
August 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Victor B. Kenton |
Margaret M. Morrow |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 137 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff Intelligent SCM, LLC ("ISCM") and defendant Bridget Speed have entered into a settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") resolving the claims against her in this action. In ac cordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Court awards judgment in the amount of $157,500 against Mrs. Speed and in favor of ISCM, of which $105,000 has already been satisfied, leaving a net judgment amount of $52,500. E xcept as provided in the Settlement Agreement, ISCM takes nothing from Bridget Speed and/or Andrew Speed in this action. Having granted Plaintiff ISCM's motion for default judgment against Defendant Qannu Pty Ltd. ("Qannu") 127 by order dated 9/30/2016, judgment is entered in favor of ISCM against Defendant Qannu. Defendant Qannu is ordered to pay ISCM the sum of $182,649.49. (gk) |
Filing 52 PROTECTIVE ORDER APPROVED by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton re Stipulation for Protective Order 51 (See Order for details) (rh) |
Filing 33 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Qannu PTY LTD by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/9/2015. (ah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.