Pegasus Imports, LLC v. PT. Wahyu Pradana Binamulia et al
| Pegasus Imports, LLC |
| Does and PT. Wahyu Pradana Binamulia |
| PT. Wahyu Pradana Binamulia |
| Pegasus Imports, LLC |
| 2:2014cv06843 |
| September 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
FOURTH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court sees no need to require a Rule 41 filing before the conditions of theAgreement are met, and hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, inwriting, by February 22, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. A Rule 41 dismissal filing will be deemed compliance with this Order. (vv)
|
|
Filing
82
THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court sees no need to require a Rule 41 filing before the conditions of the Agreement are met, and hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by January 25, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. A Rule 41 dismissal filing will be deemed compliance with this Order. (lc)
|
|
Filing
80
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by November 26, 2015, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. If no dismissal in compliance withFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is filed by November 26, 2015, the Court will recalendar all pending pretrial and trial dates and deadlines. (lc)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by November 5, 2015, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action will REMAIN on calendar until settlement is finalized. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lom)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 39 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Parties should limit their arguments to ten pages, exclusive of exhibits and evidentiary support. To the extent that parties rely on evidence previously submitted, citations to the record will suffice. Simultaneous submissions are due October 15, 2015. All other dates and deadlines in this action REMAIN on calendar. (iv)
|
|
Filing
27
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order 25 . See document for details. (yb)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS 13 . Pegasus shall answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Counterclaim in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 10/10/2014 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
