Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Reed Sportswear Manufacturing Co. et al
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant: Does and Reed Sportswear Manufacturing Co.
Case Number: 2:2015cv00749
Filed: February 2, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY ACTION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II in favor of Deckers Outdoor Corporation and against Reed Sportswear Manufacturing Co.Defendant and its agents,e tc. and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Consent Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined Plaintiff and Defendant shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees associated with this action. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)
July 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by August 1, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further details. (jy)
April 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court, having reviewed the joint status report regarding settlement finds that GOOD CAUSE IS HEREBY SHOWN to continue the OSC re Settlement from April 8, 2016 to May 6, 2016. (lc)
February 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. In light of the Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 38), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by March 11, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. In re: Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . (NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT) (mkr)
September 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 18 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Reed Sportswear Manufacturing Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Represented By: Brent H Blakely
Represented By: Cindy W Chan
Represented By: Jessica C Covington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reed Sportswear Manufacturing Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?