Rene Machuca v. F. Foulk
Petitioner: Rene Machuca
Respondent: F. Foulk
Case Number: 2:2015cv00762
Filed: February 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P. Rosenbluth
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Louise A. LaMothe, in favor of F. Foulk against Rene Machuca Related to Report and Recommendation (Issued) 22 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United StatesMagistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dfi)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rene Machuca v. F. Foulk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: F. Foulk
Represented By: William H Shin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rene Machuca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?