Ricky Howard v. Paulette Finander et al
Plaintiff: Ricky Howard
Defendant: Paulette Finander
Case Number: 2:2015cv01317
Filed: February 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Percy Anderson for NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint 51 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 66 , Rep ort and Recommendation (Issued) 71 . Defendant Finander's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 51) is denied; defendants Marcelo and Fitter's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 66) is granted only to the extent of dismissing without leave to amend a ny potential claim for retaliation against defendants Marcelo and Fitter only; and defendants Marcelo and Fitter's Motion to Dismiss is denied in all other respects. Defendants are ordered to answer the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen days of this Order. (hr)
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Marcela and Fitter Should Not Be Dismissed for Plaintiffs Failure to Prosecute. Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, that is, by July 25, 2017, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
October 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, that is, by November 3, 2015, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
July 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, that is, by August 4, 2015, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ricky Howard v. Paulette Finander et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paulette Finander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricky Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?