Elias Calderon v. City of South Gate et al
Elias Adolfo Calderon |
All Involved South Gate Police Department Officers Does, City of South Gate, City of South Gate Police Department and Does |
2:2015cv01811 |
March 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M. Gee |
Alicia G. Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant City of South Gate and against Plaintiff Elias Adolfo Calderon. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Filing 24 IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before January 25, 2016 why this action should not be dismis sed as to defendants City of South Gate Police Department and All Involved South Gate Police Department Officers Does for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitte d upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendants City of South Gate Police Department and All Involved South Gate Police Department Officers Does if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.