Clifford Payne v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
||Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Cox, V. Edwards, J. Lewis, J. Rachal, John Soto, James E. Titton and D. J. Williams
||April 16, 2015
||US District Court for the Central District of California
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 19, 2018
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of Clifford Payne against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 57 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Second Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed without leave to amend. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (et)
|October 27, 2016
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute. Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, that is, by November 17, 2016, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. (kca)
|September 13, 2016
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation 25 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 21 ) is granted; plaintiffs claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are dismissed with prejudice; and plaintiffs claims for monetary relief are dismissed with leave to amend. (See document for further details.) (iva)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?