Luis F. Gutierrez v. Eduardo Garcia
Plaintiff: Luis Gutierrez
Defendant: Eduardo Garcia
Case Number: 2:2015cv03727
Filed: May 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 21 . It is adjudged that plaintiff shall recover from defendants $25,000.00, plus such costs as may be taxed by the clerk and such attorneys fees as may be awarded by the court. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luis F. Gutierrez v. Eduardo Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eduardo Garcia
Represented By: John W Fagerholm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis Gutierrez
Represented By: Michael L Tracy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?