Kyle Anthony Lewis v. United States America
| Kyle Anthony Lewis |
| Does and United States America |
| 2:2015cv08354 |
| October 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Motor Vehicle |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
AMENDED JUDGMENT 90 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court orders that plaintiff Kyle Lewis recover from defendant United States America the amount of $144,483.00, plus $2,154.11 in costs (per Court Order). Post judgment interest at a ra te of 1.16% per annum is awarded to plaintiff in the event that: (1) the United States appeals; (2) the judgment is affirmed on appeal; and (3) plaintiff files the transcript of the judgment with the Secretary of the Treasury. Such interest shall be paid "only from the date of filing of the transcript of the judgment with the Secretary of the Treasury through the day before the date of the mandate of affirmance." (gk)
|
|
Filing
90
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court order's that the Plaintiff, Kyle Lewis, recover from the Defendant, United States America, the amount of $144,483.00, plus $2,154.11 in costs (per Court Order) and also post judgment interest at a rate of 1.16% per annum. (gk)
|
|
Filing
86
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court awards plaintiff $144,483 in total damages. See document for further details. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk)
|
|
Filing
52
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing and Final Pretrial Conference held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude All Testimony from Defendant's Experts 27 ; Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Collateral Sources 28 ; Defendant's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert's Opinions Based on Undisclosed MRI Images 29 ; Defendant's Motion in Limine NO. 2 to Exclude Portion of Police Report 30 . Plaintiff 9;s motion in limine no. 1 is DENIED without prejudice, subject to a further showing at trial. Plaintiff's motion in limine no. 2 is DENIED. The Government's motion in limine no. 1 is DENIED. The Court GRANTS the Government's unopposed motion in limine no. 2. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
