Michael Ibarra v. Raymond Madden
Petitioner: Michael Ibarra
Respondent: Raymond Madden
Case Number: 2:2015cv08460
Filed: October 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge: Alexander F. MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The First Amended Petition is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Re Order Accepting Report and Recommendations 60 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ib)
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/19/2016. (ib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Ibarra v. Raymond Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Ibarra
Represented By: Lisa M Bassis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Raymond Madden
Represented By: Eric J Kohm
Represented By: Scott A Taryle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?