B.A.S.A. Trading, Inc. v. CLO Apparel Inc. et al
| B.A.S.A. Trading, Inc. |
| CLO Apparel, Inc., Does, ITEX Corporation, Novelty Fabrics, Inc. and S and J Apparel, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv09954 |
| December 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Alka Sagar |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Plaintiff B.A.S.A. Trading, Inc.'s Application for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendants Design by Nature, LLC dba ITEX ("ITEX") and Novelty Fabrics, Inc. (" ;Novelty Fabrics") (collectively "Defendants") 112 , it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: Defendant ITEX shall pay Plaintiff damages in the amount of $19,220.30. Defendant Novelty Fabrics shall pay Plaintiff damages in th e amount of $4,111.75. Plaintiff is entitled to post-judgment interest on the amount of the Judgment from the date of entry of Judgment until the date the Judgment is paid in full at the statutory rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(a). It i s further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants, along with their respective directors, officers, partners, associates, affiliates, agents, servants, employees, shareholders, representatives, and assigns, and all others under their control or in active concert or participation with them are permanently restrained, enjoined, and prohibited re Plaintiff's CPTD101 Print design, etc. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
95
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 26, 2017, why this action should not be dis missed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
|
Filing
55
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar re Amended Stipulated Protective Order 53 . (See document for complete details) (afe)
|
|
Filing
45
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 5, 2016, why this action should not be dismis sed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Order to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U. S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before August 16, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for la ck of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) resp onse. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Novelty Fabrics, Inc.; and Design by Nature, LLC did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing
31
(IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 6, 2016, why this action should not be dismisse d for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
|
Filing
11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before March 18, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
