Solo Industries, Inc. v. Jeffrey Han
Plaintiff: Solo Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Jeffrey Han and Jeffrey Han individually doing business as 7Pipe
Case Number: 2:2016cv00244
Filed: January 12, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2016 Filing 32 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order to Dismiss) (mrgo)
September 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #30 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
September 6, 2016 Filing 30 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Solo Industries, Inc.. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Behrendt, Kevin)
August 25, 2016 Filing 29 MINUTES OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT Hearing held before Judge George H. Wu. Show Cause Hearing continued to 9/8/2016 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Parties will file a joint status report by noon on September 6, 2016. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (mrgo)
August 24, 2016 Filing 28 STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Plaintiff Solo Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Behrendt, Kevin)
July 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu, re Notice of Settlement #26 . All pending deadlines are hereby stayed until August 24, 2016 or until dismissal papers are filed, whichever occurs first. The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Settlement hearing for August 25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. (shb)
July 25, 2016 Filing 26 NOTICE of Settlement and Motion to Stay all Deadlines filed by Defendant Jeffrey Han. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pearson, Matthew)
July 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #24 , defendant Jeffrey Han answer due 7/25/2016. (mrgo)
July 8, 2016 Filing 24 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 07/25/2016 filed by Defendant Jeffrey Han. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew D. Pearson in Support of Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (L.R. 7-1), #2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order in Support of Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (L.R. 7-1))(Pearson, Matthew)
June 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (L.R. 7-1) by Judge George H. Wu: The Court, having read and considered the parties' Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (L.R. 7-1); [Proposed] Order; and Declaration of Matthew D. Pearson, and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor, The deadline for Defendant JEFFREY HAN, individually and d/b/a 7PIPE, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff SOLO INDUSTRIES, INC.'s Complaint is continued to July 11, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. (cr)
June 24, 2016 Filing 22 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 11, 2016 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Jeffrey Han. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew D. Pearson, #2 Proposed Order)(Pearson, Matthew)
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (L.R. 7-1) by Judge George H. Wu: The deadline for Defendant JEFFREY HAN, individually and d/b/a 7PIPE, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff SOLO INDUSTRIES, INC.'s Complaint is continued to June 27, 2016. (cr)
May 27, 2016 Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 27, 2016 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Jeffrey Han. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew D. Pearson in Support of Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint, #2 Proposed Order in Support of Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint)(Pearson, Matthew)
May 26, 2016 Filing 19 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Matthew Pearson on behalf of Defendant Jeffrey Han. Filed by Defendant Jeffrey Han (Attorney Matthew D Pearson added to party Jeffrey Han(pty:dft))(Pearson, Matthew)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (L.R. 7-1) #17 by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have up to and including May 27, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (lom)
April 22, 2016 Filing 17 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to May 27, 2016 filed by Defendant Jeffrey Han. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wolf, Bonnie)
April 6, 2016 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jeffrey Han answer now due 4/27/2016, filed by Defendant Jeffrey Han.(Attorney Bonnie J Wolf added to party Jeffrey Han(pty:dft))(Wolf, Bonnie)
March 23, 2016 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Solo Industries, Inc., upon Defendant Jeffrey Han served on 3/3/2016, answer due 3/24/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jeffrey Han in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Behrendt, Kevin)
March 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. The Court is in receipt of Report on the Filing of an Action, document number #13 . The Status Conference scheduled for April 4, 2016, is hereby vacated. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 14, 2016 Filing 13 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Solo Industries, Inc.. (Behrendt, Kevin)
March 14, 2016 Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Solo Industries, Inc., identifying Gary Bryman. (Behrendt, Kevin)
March 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: On March 3, 2016, the Court ordered counsel to show cause in writing, no later than March 11, 2016, why the above-entitled action should not be dismissed for failure to submit the Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark and/or Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright. To date, counsel have not complied with this order. The Court sets a Status Conference for April 4, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. (cr)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBMISSION OF FORMS AO 120 (PATENT OR TRADEMARK) AND/OR AO 121 (COPYRIGHT) by Judge George H. Wu. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/11/2016. (kss)
January 28, 2016 Filing 9 STANDING ORDER Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu, (mg)
January 13, 2016 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Jeffrey Han. (ghap)
January 13, 2016 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
January 13, 2016 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (ghap)
January 13, 2016 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
January 13, 2016 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap)
January 12, 2016 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Solo Industries, Inc.. (Behrendt, Kevin)
January 12, 2016 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Solo Industries, Inc.. (Behrendt, Kevin)
January 12, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-17088195 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Solo Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Attorney Kevin Ryan Behrendt added to party Solo Industries, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Behrendt, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Solo Industries, Inc. v. Jeffrey Han
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Solo Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin Ryan Behrendt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Han
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Han individually doing business as 7Pipe
Represented By: Matthew D Pearson
Represented By: Bonnie J Wolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?