David Jose Dong Ryu v. Fashiongo Korea et al
Plaintiff: David Jose Dong Ryu, David Jose Ryu and Dong Ryel Ryu
Defendant: Fashiongo Korea, Naver, Fashiongo a U.S. form unknown doing business as Fashiongo.net, Bee 3 Stars Corp. doing business as Fashiongo.net, 3 Stars Mentoring doing business as Compsolution, Ho Mok Lee, LAMBS, NHN and Does 1-50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2016cv00691
Filed: February 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Frederick F Mumm
2 Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice on the ground that the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction. The pending motions to dismiss and for sanctions #14 , #16 are denied without prejudice as moot. The hearing on 8/19/2016 is VACATED. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
August 11, 2016 Filing 33 RESPONSE filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Leeto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #30 (Pham, Christopher)
August 10, 2016 Filing 32 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Opposition thereto and also Response to Order to Show Cause Re: the Case should not be dismissed, filed by Plaintiff David Jose Ryu. Motion set for hearing on 8/19/2016 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Kim, Andrew)
August 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER AND NOTICE TO PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On July 26, 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing, no later thanAugust 9, 2016, why the above-entitled action should not be dismissed as to Defendant Fashiongo Korea and Lambs for failure to prosecute. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response. Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice as to Defendant Fashiongo Korea and Lambs only under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to prosecute. (shb)
August 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Therefore, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by August 11, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See order for details.) (kti)
August 2, 2016 Filing 29 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Sanctions Against Plaintiff Ryu and/or Plaintiff's Counsel Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure #16 filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. (Pham, Christopher)
August 2, 2016 Filing 28 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #14 filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. (Pham, Christopher)
July 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before August 9, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants Fashiongo Korea and Lambs for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendants Fashiongo Korea and Lambs if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
July 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (iv)
July 26, 2016 Filing 25 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Transfer Pursuant to General Order 14-03 filed on July 25, 2016. Please take notice that the new Magistrate Judge is Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Please substitute the initials DMG in place of the current initials, so that the case number will now read CV 16-00691-DMG (AGRx). Pursuant to Judge Gee's procedures and schedules, civil motions are heard on Fridays at 9:30 a.m. Defendants Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #14 and Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's Counsel #16 presently set for September 6, 2016 are hereby RESET to August 19, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. (iv)
July 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 14-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:08-cv-02826 DMG(MANx). Case transferred from Judge Philip S. Gutierrez to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:16-cv-00691 DMG(AGRx). Signed by Judge Dolly M. Gee (rn)
July 21, 2016 Filing 23 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Please be advised that the following motions are hereby reset to 09/19/16 at 1:30pm: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS #14 and DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS #16 .THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 21, 2016 Filing 22 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (wm)
July 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
July 21, 2016 Filing 20 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:16-cv-00691 PSG(AGRx). (rn)
July 20, 2016 Filing 19 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. Related Case(s): 08-cv-02826 DMG(MANx) (Pham, Christopher)
July 20, 2016 Filing 18 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. correcting NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #14 , Request for Judicial Notice #15 (Pham, Christopher)
July 20, 2016 Filing 17 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Sanctions Against Plaintiff Ryu and/or Plaintiff's Counsel Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure #16 filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. (Pham, Christopher)
July 20, 2016 Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Sanctions Against Plaintiff Ryu and/or Plaintiff's Counsel Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. Motion set for hearing on 9/6/2016 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ho Mok Lee in Support of Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Inc., Bee 3 Stars Corp., (Erroneously Named) Fashiongo, and Ho Mok Lee's Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff Ryu and.or Plaintiff's Counsel Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, #2 Declaration Declaration of Christopher Q Pham in Support of Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Inc., Bee 3 Stars Corp., (Erroneously Named) Fashiongo, and Ho Mok Lee's Motion for Sanctions Against Ryu and/or Plaintiff's Counsel Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, #3 Proposed Order) (Pham, Christopher)
July 20, 2016 Filing 15 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #14 filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Ho Mok Lee. (Pham, Christopher)
July 20, 2016 Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. Motion set for hearing on 9/6/2016 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jason R. Vener in Support of Motion of Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring, Inc., Bee 3 Stars Corp., (Erroneously Named) Fashiongo, and Ho Mok Lee to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) Plaintiff David Jose Dong Ryu's First Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order) (Pham, Christopher)
June 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days),, #12 , Defendants 3 Stars Mentoring answer due 7/20/2016; Bee 3 Stars Corp. answer due 7/20/2016; Fashiongo answer due 7/20/2016; Ho Mok Lee answer due 7/20/2016 by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm : (see attached) (jm)
June 8, 2016 Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 08/05/2016 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 filed by Plaintiff 3 Stars Mentoring, Bee 3 Stars Corp., Fashiongo, Ho Mok Lee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Christopher Q Pham added to party 3 Stars Mentoring(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Q Pham added to party Bee 3 Stars Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Q Pham added to party Fashiongo (pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Q Pham added to party Ho Mok Lee(pty:dft))(Pham, Christopher)
May 26, 2016 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 . The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected.Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below The correct event is: Amended Complaint.: Docket entry description does not match the title of the document.. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (mz)
May 25, 2016 Filing 10 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 02/01/2016, receipt number 097317201735), filed by plaintiff David Jose Ryu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kim, Andrew)
May 11, 2016 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff David Jose Ryu pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Naver. (Kim, Andrew)
May 11, 2016 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Jose Ryu, upon Defendant 3 Stars Mentoring served on 5/10/2016, answer due 5/31/2016; Bee 3 Stars Corp. served on 5/10/2016, answer due 5/31/2016; Does served on 5/10/2016, answer due 5/31/2016; Fashiongo served on 5/10/2016, answer due 5/31/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Christopher Pham, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, Andrew)
May 10, 2016 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued, re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to All Defendants. (mz)
April 4, 2016 Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (jm)
February 2, 2016 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Jose Ryu, (Kim, Andrew)
February 2, 2016 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Jose Ryu. (Kim, Andrew)
February 2, 2016 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Main Document replaced due to previously attached complaint was upside down. (car)
February 2, 2016 Filing 2 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car)
February 1, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-17201735 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff David Jose Ryu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Andrew K Kim added to party David Jose Ryu(pty:pla))(Kim, Andrew) (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/2/2016) (car).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Jose Dong Ryu v. Fashiongo Korea et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fashiongo Korea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Naver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fashiongo a U.S. form unknown doing business as Fashiongo.net
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bee 3 Stars Corp. doing business as Fashiongo.net
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3 Stars Mentoring doing business as Compsolution
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ho Mok Lee
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAMBS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NHN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Jose Dong Ryu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Jose Ryu
Represented By: Andrew K Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dong Ryel Ryu
Represented By: Andrew K Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?