Christopher Jaramillo v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| Christopher Jaramillo |
| City of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles Police Department |
| 2:2016cv01227 |
| February 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERAL CAUSES OF ACTION AND REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Before the Court is Jaramillo's motion to voluntarily dismiss his federal causes of action unde r Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), for leave to file a first amended complaint, and for remand of the remaining state law causes of action to state court 49 . Defendants only oppose Jaramillo's request for remand. Jaramillo's Moti on to dismiss the federal causes of action is GRANTED, the Motion to dismiss the remaining state law claims is GRANTED, and the Motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED as moot. The Court construes Jaramillo's motion to remand as one to dismiss the action in the alternative. The action is thus DISMISSED without prejudice. Jaramillo shall continue to abide by the terms of the protective order filed in this action. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing
32
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Re Amended Stipulation for Protective Order 31 . (ib)
|
|
Filing
9
(IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before June 7, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack o f prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
