Andre Borrows v. Spreadshirt, Inc. et al
| Andre Borrows |
| Does and Spreadshirt, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv02064 |
| March 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A. Oliver |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than June 26, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's filing of a noticed motion for entry of default judgment for the defendant-Roderick Rodriguez. (smo)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II.The Court previously issued an order to show cause why Defendants Grigori Boudenkov, Barry Higgins, and Andrew Higgins should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff filed a response to that order on April 5, 2017, asking for additional time to serve these three Defendants. (ECF No. 53.) The Court will allow Plaintiff until May 15, 2017, to serve these Defendants. If Plaintiff does not file proofs of service for these Defendants on or before May 17, 2017, the Court will dismiss them without prejudice without further notice. (smo)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, no later than April 5, 2017, why the Court should not dismiss those three Defendants for failure to effect service of process within the Rule 4(m) period. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a proof of service as to each Defendant. Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice without further warning from the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE : RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:In light of the Notice of Settlement with Defendant Chase McDuffie, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by December 27, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized with this Defendant. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
