AG Global Products, LLC et al v. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. et al
AG Global Products, LLC and FHI Brands, LLC |
Does, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Sally Beauty Supply, LLC |
2:2016cv02364 |
April 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Manuel L. Real |
Jean P. Rosenbluth |
Patent |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41 by Judge Manuel L. Real: The Court having considered the Agreed Motion to Dismiss All Claims 35 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' declaratory judgment counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (gk) |
Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than July 15, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In accorda nce with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.