Insolvency Services Group, Inc. v. Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Insolvency Services Group, Inc. v. Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.

Insolvency Services Group, Inc. v. Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Insolvency Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:	Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2016cv02710
Filed:	April 20, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	R. Gary Klausner
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 19, 2017	Filing 58 ORDER BASED UPON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge R. Gary Klausner, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 57 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)
July 8, 2016	Filing 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing on or before July11, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Michelangel o Leasing, Inc. If plaintiff files an application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to defendant Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.(answer was due 07/01/2016, on or before July 11, 2016, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause. (sw)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 19, 2017

Filing 58 ORDER BASED UPON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge R. Gary Klausner, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 57 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)

July 8, 2016

Filing 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing on or before July11, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Michelangel o Leasing, Inc. If plaintiff files an application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to defendant Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.(answer was due 07/01/2016, on or before July 11, 2016, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause. (sw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Insolvency Services Group, Inc. v. Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Insolvency Services Group, Inc.
Represented By:	Russell L Allyn
Represented By:	Steven M Spector
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michelangelo Leasing, Inc.
Represented By:	Richard E Segal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?