Daniel Garza v. City of Los Angeles et al
Daniel Garza |
Police Chief Charlie Beck, Pofice Officer Mario Cardona, Police Officer Mario Cardona, City of Los Angeles and Does |
2:2016cv03579 |
May 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F. MacKinnon |
Stephen V. Wilson |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 369 JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANT(S) by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff(s): take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and that the defendant(s): recover of the plaintiff(s) its costs of action, taxed in the sum of (to be determined). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo) |
Filing 198 JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICTFOR PLAINTIFF by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in the amount of $210,000.00 and against defendants City of Los Angeles, Charlie Beck, Mario Cardona. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo) |
Filing 182 JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR THE PLAINTIFF by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of Daniel Garza against City of Los Angeles, Charlie Beck, Mario Cardona in the principal amount of $$210,000.00, interest thereon at the legal rate as provided by law, and its costs of action, taxed in the sum of (to be determined). Total judgment of $210,000.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr) Modified on 6/27/2017 (cr). |
Filing 42 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon re Stipulation for Protective Order 40 . (ib) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.