Royal Printex, Inc. v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Royal Printex, Inc.
Defendant: Does and Walmart Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv03633
Filed: May 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: Terry J. Hatter
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr 47 , 54 , 55 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for sanctions and contempt is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 1. Defendants E.S. Sutton, Inc. and Extra Sportswear, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants") are hereby found by this Court to be in civil contempt; 2. Defendants are hereby again compelled to comply with all aspects of the Magistrate Judge's initial Order, dated September 29, 2017 (Docket No. 47). [See Order for further details.] (san)
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re: MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses of Defendants E.S. Sutton, Inc. and Extra Sportswear, Inc. 39 . Defendants did not contribute their portion of the Joint Stipulation nor file any other opposition. Therefore, the Court issues an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") why Plaintiff's Motion should not be granted in its entirety, including as to sanctions. Defendants must respond by Wednesday, September 27, 2017. If the Court does not receive a response to this OSC by that date, the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Plaintiff. (san)
December 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order 19 . (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Royal Printex, Inc. v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Royal Printex, Inc.
Represented By: Trevor William Barrett
Represented By: Scott A Burroughs
Represented By: Stephen M Doniger
Represented By: Justin M Gomes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?