Starbucks Corporation v. Hitman Glass et al
||Does, Hitman Glass and James Landgraf
||June 3, 2016
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Patrick J. Walsh
||Otis D. Wright
|Nature of Suit:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 24, 2017
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT HITMAN GLAS (SEE DOCUMENT RE SPECIFICS) 51 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
|October 21, 2016
DEFAULT JUDGMENT 34 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Defendant James Landgraf is liable for Plaintiffs claims of trademark dilution, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and false designation of origin. Plaintiff shall recover from Defendant James Landgraf the sum of $410,580.00 in damages.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.). (lc) Modified on 10/21/2016. (lc).
|October 20, 2016
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT 34 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : The Court GRANTS Starbucks Motion for Default Judgment against Landgraf. The Court DENIES Starbucks request for permanent injunctions under both the Lanham and Copyright Acts, but GRANTS Starbucks request for $410,580 in damages and attorneys fees. Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk of the Court shall close the case against Landgraf. (lc). Modified on 10/20/2016 (lc).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?