Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. A.F.Brown Electrical Contractors Inc.
| Administrative Maintenance Fund, Contract Compliance Fund, The Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the National IBEW-NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan and Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund |
| A.F.Brown Electrical Contractors Inc. |
| 2:2016cv05800 |
| August 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs, shall recover, from Defendant, A.F. Brown Electrical Contractors Inc., a California corporation, the principal amount of $121,314.10, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum accruing from July 15, 2017, until the judgment is paid in full. (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
