William Brockhaus v Luis Miguel Gallego Basteri
Plaintiff: William Brockhaus
Defendant: Luis Migel Gallego Basteri
Case Number: 2:2016cv06275
Filed: August 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER re: FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF CONTEMPT ORDER AGAINST THIRD PARTY JOE MADERA OF CONTEMPT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. It is therefore recommended that the District Judge set an Order to Show Cause re: Contempt. (See order for details.) NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT (bem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: William Brockhaus v Luis Miguel Gallego Basteri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Brockhaus
Represented By: R David Jacobs
Represented By: Amy B Messigian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luis Migel Gallego Basteri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?