Briana Valdez v. Synchrony Bank

Briana Valdez v. Synchrony Bank

Plaintiff:	Briana Valdez, CA
Defendant:	Synchrony Bank
Case Number:	2:2016cv06550
Filed:	August 31, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge:	Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 1, 2017	Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 16 . Upon review of the Stipulation to Dismiss Synchrony Bank with Prejudice (Doc. 16 ), filed by Plaintiff Briana Valdez and Defendant Synchrony Bank and good causeappearing, IT IS ORDERED granting the Stipulation (Doc. 16 ). The above-entitled matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)
November 17, 2016	Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by January 4, 2017, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 1, 2017

Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 16 . Upon review of the Stipulation to Dismiss Synchrony Bank with Prejudice (Doc. 16 ), filed by Plaintiff Briana Valdez and Defendant Synchrony Bank and good causeappearing, IT IS ORDERED granting the Stipulation (Doc. 16 ). The above-entitled matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)

November 17, 2016

Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by January 4, 2017, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Briana Valdez v. Synchrony Bank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Briana Valdez, CA
Represented By:	Stuart M Price
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?