Marques Binns v. Neil McDonald
Petitioner: Marques Binns
Respondent: Neil McDonald
Case Number: 2:2016cv06853
Filed: September 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Pursuant to this Court's contemporaneously issued Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent warden and against petitioner Marques Sayyed Binns. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marques Binns v. Neil McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marques Binns
Represented By: Lori-Ann C Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Neil McDonald
Represented By: Herbert S Tetef
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?