JNCO Holdings, LLC et al v. Guotai USA Co., Ltd. et al
| JNCO Holdings, LLC and JNCO, LLC |
| Isaac Cohen, Joseph Cohen, Does, Guotai USA Co., Ltd., IC Brands, Inc. and Jiangsu Guotai Litian Enterprises Co., Ltd. |
| 2:2016cv06948 |
| September 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Protective Order, 109 (ch)
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PARTIES' PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court has received and considered the parties' proposed Stipulated Protective Order ("Protective Order") 106 . The parties' stipulation does not contain sufficient statements to demonstrate good cause for issuing the protective order. In any revised stipulated protective order submitted to the Court, the parties must include a statement demonstrati ng good cause for entry of a protective order pertaining to the documents or information described in the order. The paragraph containing the statement of good cause should be preceded by a heading stating: "GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT." (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER DENYING THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 85 . Third Party Plaintiffs may refile their motion at the conclusion of the proceedings against Haim by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Defendant(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than April 17, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.The Court will consid er the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's filing of a noticed motion for entry of default judgment for the defendants- Jacob Abikzer and J & Company Jeans, LLC. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (jy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
