Lamar Thomas v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff: Lamar Thomas
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2016cv07641
Filed: October 13, 2016
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge: George H. Wu
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 27, 2017 23 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 22 . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the judgment be entered for the defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lamar Thomas v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Marla K Letellier
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamar Thomas
Represented By: Bill LaTour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?