Jose Amador Jacobo v. Jagbir Grewal et al
| Jose Amador Jacobo |
| Does, Jagbir Grewal and Luis and Christine Valenzuela Trust |
| 2:2016cv07647 |
| October 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CAUSE RE. by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by September 18, 2017, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court issued an order setting a scheduling conference in this matter for March 27, 2016 12 . The parties were required to submit a joint Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) report to the Court by March 20, 2017. However, no such report was filed by that date. The Court orders the parties to show cause on or before March 23, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Submission of a joint report by that date will also discharge this order. (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
