Robert Dale Arthur v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff: Robert Dale Arthur
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2016cv07693
Filed: October 15, 2016
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 14, 2018 25 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order 24 filed herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert Dale Arthur v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Dale Arthur
Represented By: Cyrus Safa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?