Cass Garcia v. Baldwin Park Unified School District et al
| Cass Garcia |
| Baldwin Park Unified School District, Baldwin Park Unified School District Police Department, Does and Rene Trujillo |
| 2:2016cv07869 |
| October 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John F. Walter |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MINUTE (In Chambers) by Judge John F. Walter, re Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 45 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
43
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich: Granted, The parties' stipulation is adopted by the court. 41 (klg)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge John F. Walter: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than December 12, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of an answer by the def endant or an application for entry of default by the plaintiff, pursuant to Federal Ruleof Civil Procedure 55(a). No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (cw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
