Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Khaled Almaleh et al
| Liberty Insurance Corporation |
| Khaled Almaleh, Stephanie Mason and Robert Nelson |
| 2:2016cv08170 |
| November 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Liberty Insurance Corporation against Khaled Almaleh, Robert Nelson, Stephanie Mason: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Liberty and against Defendants K. Almaleh, Stephanie Mason, and Robert Nelson. Liberty had, and has, no duty to defend or indemnify K. Almaleh, or to pay any portion of his defense costs, in an underlying state court lawsuit entitled Stephanie Mason et al. v. Khaled Al Maleh, et al., in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC605894 (the "Underlying Action.") Liberty is entitled to immediately withdraw from the defense of K. Almaleh in the Underlying Action. Liberty is also entitled to reimbursement of $3,428.05 for the defense costs it has incurred to date to defend K. Almaleh in the Underlying Action. The costs are recoverable from K. Almaleh only. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/14/2017. (wm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
