Prime Healthcare Services San Dimas, LLC v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Plaintiff: Prime Healthcare Services San Dimas, LLC
Defendant: Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Case Number: 2:2017cv00075
Filed: January 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge: Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re Stipulation for Protective Order 39 . (See document for details). (mr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prime Healthcare Services San Dimas, LLC v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prime Healthcare Services San Dimas, LLC
Represented By: Troy Allyn Schell
Represented By: Bryan S Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?