Jesus Martinez v. California Court of Appeal
Petitioner: Jesus Martinez
Respondent: California Court of Appeal
Case Number: 2:2017cv00806
Filed: February 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Pursuant to this Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this action are dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jesus Martinez v. California Court of Appeal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: California Court of Appeal
Represented By: Benjamin T Ladinig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesus Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?