Thomas B Limbrick v. Performance Contracting Group, Inc.
| Thomas B Limbrick |
| Performance Contracting Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2017cv01463 |
| February 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Jean P. Rosenbluth. New Case Number 8:17-cv-320 CJC(JPRx). (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Amended) filed by Defendant Performance Contracting Group, Inc. identifying Performance Contracting Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Sheehan, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2017-00898561 Receipt No: 0973-19405407 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Performance Contracting Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, #4 Certificate of Service) (Attorney John T Sheehan added to party Performance Contracting Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sheehan, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
