Zachary Eugene Williams v. New Day Baby Powder-Andes Group et al
Plaintiff: Zachary Eugene Williams
Defendant: Keefe Commissary Network Sales, LAC-U.S.C. Medical Center, Los Angeles Mens Central Jail-Medical and New Day Baby Powder-Andes Group
Case Number: 2:2017cv01639
Filed: March 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. On October 27, 2017, plaintiff submitted a Notice of Dismissal form, in which he indicated he was dismissing the action "in its entirety." However, he also handwrote the following: "Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Have this matter remanded to state superior court of Los Angles California. PLEASE REPLY!" ("Motion") 19 . Construed liberally, it appears that plaintiff is seeking to have the Court dismiss t he action in this Court and then "remand" or transfer the action to the state superior court. Plaintiff's Motion to remand this action to state court is DENIED. Nothing in this Order is intended to preclude plaintiff from initially fi ling his claims in the appropriate California superior court. Plaintiff is advised that if he does not file by November 13, 2017, a Fourth Amended Complaint remedying the deficiencies set out in the Order Dismissing plaintiff's TAC, plaintiff&# 039;s action shall be dismissed in its entirety as authorized by plaintiff in his October 27, 2017, Notice of Dismissal, and/or for the reasons set forth in the Court's October 2, 2017, Order, and/or for failure to prosecute and/or to follow court orders. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (ch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zachary Eugene Williams v. New Day Baby Powder-Andes Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keefe Commissary Network Sales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAC-U.S.C. Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles Mens Central Jail-Medical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Day Baby Powder-Andes Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zachary Eugene Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?